Filed under: Entertainment, Weird | Tags: Elton John, GQ, Lily Allen, Scientology, stupid people
…but you can’t take the drunk from the drink. Actually that seems rather negative. Good luck to you if you’re thinking of quitting drinking. Personally I think only quitters quit. Anyway, the pretentious “GQ awards”, who have the audacity to hand out titles like “man of the year” to handsome young actors for feats such as taking a picture with an ethnic minority member, apparently took place although this year they managed to achieve something it seems. Almost two full minutes of entertainment right here:
I think Lilly Allen is the one that sings about Sainsburys or somesuch isn’t she? The repulsive little troglodite.
Speaking of repulsive. Watch this promo video for scientology. As a test for just how vanilla it is try replacing the word “scientologist” with any kind of role, occupational or otherwise, and the word “scientology” with a by product or tool related to said role. For example: “bee keeper” and “honey”, or “gynaecologist” and “lubricant”. See what you can come up with, most entertaining entry wins a fake biography I make of them posted on my blog.
Filed under: Daily life | Tags: Japanese insurance quandries, stupid people, TV
Hehehe .. todays summer time-sink is episodes of “The Day Today” from the early 90’s. Chris Morris is a genius.
In actual news. Welsh people are incredibly stupid to an equal level of that of British airport staff apparently. It has to be said. I’m usually pretty clear on which airport it is that I’m going to be landing at when I go anywhere.
Had a meeting with the insurance company today, it lasted all of five minutes. What with my clever pictures and right of way and all I was gunning for them to take a 100% blame on the opponent approach. They however are apparently fine to accept something like 80/20. This seems ridiculous to me, however I am told this is completely normal in such situations where the police aren’t involved and the accident happened in a private area. Financially this doesn’t really affect me, I get my money back either way apparently. However, it’s more the principle of the matter. I had right of way. She/He didn’t stop. I got hit. I have pictures to prove it, he/she doesn’t. So why is the owner of my car’s insurance company paying anything at all? I’m not going to get angry and kick up a fuss because this is apparently “normal” in this country.
Having spoken to the school principal about it he said “Yeah, it’s unfortunate but without the Police involved its down to a discussion between the insurance groups, and without a police injunction they’re not likely to go for a 100/0 split”. Oh well, such is life I suppose. Can’t wee all just be friends and drive properly?
